| |
Mobile phones
Nokia phones
Nokia 6303i Classic
Nokia Asha 201
Nokia Asha 302
Nokia C1-01
Nokia C2-01
Nokia Lumia 520
Nokia Lumia 610
Nokia Lumia 620
Nokia Lumia 720
Nokia Lumia 820
Nokia Lumia 900
Nokia Lumia 920
Popular articles
Choosing a smartphone
Unlock codes
SAR values
SIM only
RSS News feed
|
|
|
Nokia X7 Review
Phone rating:
In a nutshell: The Nokia X7 is an expensive smartphone, but
it offers poor value for money. Running the Symbian Anna operating system,
which isn't our favourite and is destined to be dumped by Nokia, the
X7 suffers from a low screen resolution, slow processor, inadequate
memory, a mediocre camera and an average battery. It looks and feels
premium, but it just doesn't deliver.
Review: July 2011.
The Nokia X7 is an upgraded version of the Nokia
X6 and is available on the 3 network. The X7 is quite a bit larger
than the X6: in fact it's a bit of a slab. That's partly because of
its big 4 inch screen. It's not a bad screen: it uses AMOLED technology,
so it's bright and quite clear. It responds nicely to the touch without
too much prodding, and 4 inches is a good size. But it has a significantly
lower number of pixels than most 4 inch screens, and that means that
small fonts and HD images are a no-no. Strange really, because Nokia's
publicity blurb for the X7 makes a big deal about HD games and HD videos.
Sorry Nokia, not on a 360 x 640 pixel display.
Things don't get any better when we look at other features. Take the
camera. It's got 8 megapixels up its sleeve and can record video in
720p HD. But it's a fixed focus camera. What happened to autofocus?
Memory: a paltry 350MB of onboard memory, although an 8GB microSD card
is supplied for free. Big deal for a £400 phone. The battery?
It's just 1200mAh, which ain't good enough. The 680MHz processor isn't
fast enough for a premium smartphone.
And the most awful thing of all about the X7? It's the price. On contract
you'll have to pay £25 per month to get this phone for free, or
over £400 on pay as you go. For that amount of money you could
buy a dual-core HTC Sensation or LG
Optimus 3D. That makes us quite cross actually.
Features of the Nokia X7 include:
- Symbian Anna smartphone
- 8 megapixel full focus camera with 2x digital zoom and double LED
flash
- Video recording (720p HD), 3x digital video zoom
- Display: Capacitive touchscreen AMOLED, 16.7 million colours, 640
x 360 pixels (4 inches) with automatic display rotation
- NSeries music player (MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA formats)
- FM radio
- Stereo loudspeakers
- Ringtones: MP3 & video ringtones, 64-voice polyphonic ringtones,
vibration alert
- Integrated handsfree speaker
- Messaging: SMS, MMS, email (support for IMAP, POP, SMTP) plus attachments,
Audio messaging
- Integrated A-GPS with Ovi Maps
- Internet: HSCSD, GPRS, EDGE, 3G HSDPA (10.2 Mbps), XHTML web browser
- Connectivity: WiFi, Bluetooth 3.0, USB 2.0, 3.5 mm audio jack, TV-Out
- Memory: 350MB plus 8GB microSD card (Support for up to 32 GB)
- Flight mode
- Quadband (GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz) plus 3G (WCDMA 900/1900/2100
MHz)
- Size: 120 x 63 x 11.9 mm
- Weight: 146g
- Battery: 1200 mAh
- Talktime: 4.5 hours (3G) - 6.5 hours (2G)
- Battery standby: 450 hours
Nokia X7 User Reviews
Love your mobile? Hate it? Please share your experiences to help other
people choose the phone that's best for them. Please do not review this
phone if you have not used it. This is a review site, not a forum, so
please don't just ask questions. Please do not use swear words or offensive
language, and please, no advertising!
Average rating from 6 reviews:
Reviewed by Dale Smith from Scotland on 27th Feb
2012
i have had no complaints with the phone untill recently it slowed down
and the screen flickered on and off. Eventually it stoped working altogether
from no fault of my own untill about two hours later. This has now been
three times this has happened. If this happens to you or a person you
know I recomend sending it back to nokia under the phones warrenty and
then if you can upgrading to a phone that is not a nokia.
Rating:
Reply
Reviewed by Frankie from Bethnal Green on 22nd
Nov 2011
I just got five of these for my kids, what a great phone, I did not
know what modern phones could do, games are great, calls are clear and
they look the bees nees init, I will get another one for me now so I
can play along with me kids.
Rating:
Reply
Reviewed by Regulus from Naria on 7th Nov 2011
This phone works great, except that I wish the camera have a focus on
it instead of a snap-shot feature. I really like the clean layout of
the phone, 3 pages might not be enough on the menu... I really want
to know how to change my sms ringtone...seeing that I will most likely
to hear that than my regular ringtone..
Rating:
Reply
Reviewed by Dan from England on 2nd Aug 2011
I too am somewhat confused by the review for this phone. I have several
phones including Samsung Galaxy S, and Wave 2. Yes symbian is behind
other operating systems, but with anna the eye candy has been increased
and it feels far more pleasurable to use, the hardware is first rate
and i have no trouble comparing it in the same breathe as my galaxy
s. I think my biggest confusion in this review is battery life!? regardless
of being subjective/opinion how can the reviewer say battery life is
poor! my galaxy s with conservative use may see in the second day, this
like most nokia's can easily see out two days of decent use. The processor
is another point, it is slow compared to the competition, but more than
adequet for running symbian which is known to be conservative to run,
I have no lags whilst playing angry birds, with two or three other apps
open in the background. The screen is another area where it excels,
yes the resolution is dissapointingly low, but the amoled tech means
that colour and brightness make up for this at least to my eyes anyway.
I will always be a fan of this site but i do believe this review is
by someone who harbours a resentment for symbian or has been using android
too long. Oh and by the way you state in the specs that it has tv out,
which it catagorically does not!, again leading me to believe this review
was just going through the motions and not accurately researched
Rating:
Reply
Reviewed by adija from England on 27th Jul 2011
A poor review indeed. Did you read the specs and the price and pre judge
the phone before using it? Can you tell me why, without saying 'android
phones have more' the processor is not fast enough? I your answer isn't
along the lines of 'the phone is sluggish/ it's unresponsive' ( which
it isn't) it's going to make me think this isn't the subjective, quality
review site it used to be. Did you actually play any games on the phone?
If you did, you would know that quality games like asphalt 6 look amazing
and are very smooth and fluid which is what the gpu is for. Go and do
your research on the gpu and you'll see why nokia talk about the gaming
in the way they do. Your moan about the memory makes no sense, I've
got a 32GB memory card in my phone which is plenty, 8GB is just to get
started with, thats the whole point of expandable memory isn't it? iPhones
have no expandable memory, but Apple makes that so it ok.o The camera,
whilst not the best Nokia can offer, is not as bad you make out. It's
an eDof camera (more research needed me thinks) not full focus and as
long as you don't do macro photography and the light is good, its excellent
and certainly no worse than the cameras on the android phones you seem
to love so much. The battery, on paper, doesn't sound like much but
it lasts longer than you expect. I get through a day and a half of heavy
usage, how long did your review one last? You also conveniently haven't
mentioned the excellent Nokia Maps with free navigation without the
need to use your data connection, the wide video codec compatibility
(up to 720p which is HD, but you knew that) the new music player, the
aluminium unibody and other good things about the phone, but then, if
you haven't used the phone how would you know? My personal view of this
phone is that if you wants a well built, it screened Nokia and your
not particularly interested in having the best camera on your phone
or you want an upgrade to an x6 then this is a good option. If you the
best phone camera get an n8. If you want to talk about how fast your
processor is then you need a galaxy sII, which is admittedly a quality
phone. Finally, I would point out that I, and other people reading this
site I imagine, have little or no interest in your personal feelings,
what we want is to know how the phone works in the real world, not how
it looks like it might perform based on some specs that you've read.
Please review all phones to the same standard (like you used to) in
future, the direction this site has taken in the last couple of years
is not good, almost as biased as gizmodo these days.
Rating:
Reply
Reply by Mobile Phones UK from UK on
27th Jul 2011
Thanks for your review. Sorry you didn't like ours. We always try to
be objective, but our review is just an opinion, not a fact. Hence the
value of user contributions such as yours.
Reviewed by Marcus from UK on 23rd Jul 2011
terrible phone very like a brick phone and poor quality mine bad in
one day only. dont buy.
Rating: Reply
|
|
|